The traditional and fixed ways we understand urban space within our cities has given way to theories of dynamic urban ecology that include everyday social phenomena. Urban designers may now create custom small-scale and time-based datasets using open GIS workflows and urban sensors. Base geometry was taken from the 22@ zoning map PDF file provided by the City of Barcelona. (2012) “Parametric Urban Design: Joining Morphology and Urban Indicators in a Single Interactive Model. El Urbanismo Ecologico: Su Aplicacion En El Diseno De Un Ecobarrio En Figures.Abstract Today, many urban design studios begin with the data collected and analyzed by others and their abstraction is experientially distant from the place itself. New digital parametric methods of urban design education today support the inclusion of everyday experience of phenomena through (1) the systematic comparison of urban characteristics; (2) the inclusion of experience as phenomena over time; and (3) open formulation of urban characteristics by each student. This paper describes the methodology of three courses taught in Eugene in Oregon, Barcelona in Spain and Portland in Oregon.
EXPLORING C BY YASHWANT KANETKAR PDF EBOOK. El Urbanismo Ecologico Pdf Writer Download Free Applied Linear Algebra Olver Shakiban Pdf Merge Luxor V19lcddvd 875 Manually New Order Low Life.
Each course integrated urban design principles and table-based geospatial information (GI) computing techniques that included phenomena of place. Unlike GI planning software such as ESRI ArcGIS and City Engine, the parametric software Rhino Grasshopper, with open plugins for CSV tables and OpenStreetMaps (Coast Coast, S.
OpenStreetMap Collaborative Mapping Wiki. Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Commons.) and custom scripting, allowed students to formulate their own open tools to understand people and place.
This codification of time-based phenomena is especially relevant for the current generation of urban design students, but faces new challenges as tools of both analysis and design. ‘Parametric Places’ (off-site analysis) This media elective course in urban design and titled Parametric Places was taught in Eugene, Oregon, in the spring quarters of 2012, 2013 and 2014.It used parametric software Rhino Grasshopper and associated plugins to study open-ended planning relationships in the ‘22@’ information activities district in Barcelona. Formalized in the year 2000, 22@ district guidelines include block-by-block requirements for new development to include 10% open space, 10% social housing, 10% social services as well as requirements to protect buildings of industrial cultural significance.
Students considered these and additional urban relationships while working off-site in Eugene, Oregon, collecting data from documentation provided by the 22@ planning office, online mapping resources and general research of the Poblenou neighbourhood, Barcelona. The course began with teaching and writing exercises in urban design principles in the context of the city of Barcelona in parallel with exercises first in the non-parametric application of Rhino 3D and later with the parametric interface Grasshopper.
Students learnt methods using case studies in urban design and parametric design. Students then worked in groups of two to develop an urban analysis tool with implications for design strategies.The methodology of the course was outlined as follows: (1) Barcelona and 22@ Urban Design Background, Weeks 1–2. Urban design reading and writing assignment, general and Barcelona context. Example: Study with unit block tiling exercises in 2D and 3D (hand media diagrams). (2) Case studies in Parametric Urban Design, Weeks 3–5. Analogue parametric design in Rhino 3D / Illustrator. Digital parametric design in Grasshopper for individual relationships.(3) Student Projects, in parallel with weekly Grasshopper plugin and scripting workshops, Weeks 6–10.
Background problem and project purpose. Comparative statistics to Portland, Oregon. Background drawings: location plan of the city, district and neighbourhood scales; land use and transit diagrams.Formulation of urban characteristics and their selected indicators.
Dataset gathering. Analogue parametric drawings, digital parametric drawings in Rhino Grasshopper. Urban design strategy and drawings using analysis tool.First, students had to understand a place from an urban design approach by identifying an urban problem of their interest and only then considered the use of parametric design to creatively formulate a design solution for a local problem in Barcelona. Second, students began with analogue tiling exercises to understand parametric design.
They used the more open Rhino Grasshopper software rather than ESRI’s ArcGIS and new ESRI City Engine to formulate comparative ‘definitions’ in Grasshopper. Existing datasets such as land use files and new custom datasets were developed by each student using information gathered online off-site. Projects were conceived as tools for planners, residents and business owners to affect behavioural change of human experience rather than formal design. Students followed the method listed above to observe, analyze and develop an urban analysis tool for use in Barcelona that would be applicable in other locations.In their project ‘Intergenerational Interaction’, students Vincent Mai and Ryan Kiesler addressed the needs of Barcelona’s ageing population as caregivers today. In Barcelona, one in every five people is aged 65 or older, compared to half that percentage in Portland, Oregon ( Barcelona Municipal Plan for the Elderly 2013–2016 Barcelona Municipal Plan for the Elderly 2013–2016. Area of Quality of Life. City of Barcelona: Equality and Sport.
The percentage of population aged 65+ increased from 14% to 20.5% between 1981 and 2010 (Barcelona 2013–2016). One in every four seniors is living alone.
One in every four seniors has an income lower than €532.51 per month (Barcelona 2013–2016). El Urbanismo Ecologico Pdf MergerIn addition, the current economic crisis has left the elderly as the primary caregivers of some of the youngest generations. These social behaviours have left both generations vulnerable, and defined the urban design problem to enhance the quality of open spaces to support the interaction of these two generations.
The purpose of this project was to create an analysis and optimization tool to inform the qualitative design of intergenerational spaces in the 22@ district of Barcelona, promoting social cohesion and community connectivity. Applicable urban characteristics were identified and indicators (seen below in parenthesis) were used to measure, formulaically analyze and give geospatial understandings: (a) Seniors’ Accessibility (senior housing; senior services). (b) Youth Accessibility (kindergarten; elementary schools).(c) Popularity (third spaces).
(d) Visibility (visibility of third spaces). (e) Shading (3D geometry and building height). (f) Safety (street traffic). (g) Capacity (size).(h) Feasibility (location of open space). Base geometry was taken from the 22@ zoning map PDF file provided by the City of Barcelona.The primary source of 2D information was Google Maps and Satellite.
Google Street View was used to confirm street level information and Microsoft Bing Maps were used to supplement locational and descriptive information when views were not available in Google. Google Earth provided 3D building information.
To codify data, this project used a method previously developed with another off-site student project, City Farm (Speranza Speranza, P.“ ‘Attachment’ as Agency in off-Site and on-Site Indicators of Phenomena in Geospatial Urban Analysis Tools.” ACADIA 2014 Proceedings, 699– 708 Design Agency. ), to assign existing input values such as roof material types and building structural type to building lines and points in Rhino 3D, similar to a method using ESRI ArcGIS shape files often collected by municipalities for off-site data management of size, tax, owner and other values for properties and infrastructure. The HUMAN plugin component ‘ObjectAttribute’ was a key software element newly used in this application to read the attributes of layers and names in Rhino as data inputs in Grasshopper, mirroring the ESRI ArcGIS process. The Grasshopper plugin Galapagos was then used to compare the existing and the optimal location of open spaces formulated with other urban design characteristics. The analytical Rhino dataset to Grasshopper process was reversed using the ‘AttributeOutput’ component in HUMAN (Heumann Heumann, A., 2011 1st ed.Human (Formerly Heumann Design/Tech). Plugin to Rhinoceros 3D by Robert McNeel & Associates.) to output a custom designed spider chart that comparatively evaluated the eight urban characteristics of each study block. (a) Seniors’ Accessibility (number and location of senior housing and senior services).
(b) Youth Accessibility (number and location of kindergarten and elementary schools). (c) Popularity (number of location of third spaces). (d) Visibility (site line and number of third spaces or streets within 5 m of open space). (e) Shading (shaded / shaded + exposed = building height / tan 0 / width of block.0 is simplified as the 12 pm sun angle on 21 June). (f) Safety (SF 1 = 1 lane of traffic, buffered, wide sidewalk; and SF 8 = 3 + lanes of traffic, unbuffered, narrow sidewalk. Overall safety factor = safety factor / shortest distance.
0.36 = SF 9/25 m). (g) Capacity (size): size of open space complies with a minimum of 10% block area requirement; and size of open space support 35% (youth + elderly percentage) of residents. (h) Feasibility: proximity to existing open space (area of proposed open space to existing open space, 0‒160 m).Many of these indicators were measured as distances in metres (a, b, c, d, g and h). Shading, building height (e) measured a numerical count and ‘housing’ used the name attribute of each building to list the number of storeys. ‘Safety, street line with rating’ (f) was measured using the ‘layer’ attribute as numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 for the number of traffic lanes, value 7 at the major street Pere IV and value 0.1 at limited access passage streets within example blocks. A protocol was encouraged to increase the data consistency and only one student collected any single data type.
Codification was refined through an iterative process (Figure ). Data were codified with sound quality types catalogued and differentiated for use by a 0 to 5 rating system for use as inputs in Rhino Grasshopper using CSV tables with location based latitude and longitude information such as ESRI ArcGIS (Figure ). GI locations were brought to the CSV via custom Google My Map pin, exported as KML and converted to CSV format.The Grasshopper HUMAN plugin was then used for custom indicator formulation, analysis and visualization of the information using colour outputs over neighbourhood maps.
This project, like other in situ projects, benefited from measuring both observable use of space by people and the physical indicators of these behaviours. A challenge to this observation by students both seen in the first 108-point 3 x 3 test area in Barcelona, the more diverse test areas of various sizes in Granada and in final case study areas in Barcelona, was the interest to measure people’s behaviours directly over time. An observation at any single time, for example, around 4 pm in the summer months of July or August in these locations, would reveal very little use of public space.Some of these spaces, especially those in the everyday spaces of the city, come to life late at night.
Temperatures reaching 45 degrees Celsius could explain this behaviour by local residents. This revealed the value to record fixed indicators such as benches, waste or operable windows of more transient behaviours. Observations over time occurred but posed the challenge of other environmental variables being different. This posed a danger of data analysis if the students failed to recognize that the data may not be representative of everyday human experience. The output for this tool was an interactive visualization (Figure ) of sound quality and type for a given neighbourhood and urban room location.The interface provided a feedback loop with users as a mobile phone app or if located at situated technology such as a kiosk. The intermediate step of designing a mobile app interface between time-based design drawings and final urban intervention was particularly facile for this generation of students accustomed to mobile app interfaces through their daily lives.Should design work focus on traditional long-term resilient elements of urban design such as paving materials, permitted street-level uses, service vehicle access and serene park space, or should design work focus on the public access of information (McCullough McCullough, M.
Ambient Commons. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ) for each city user to make decisions about their use of space? The final review in Barcelona sparked an intense discussion between invited urban design professionals, academics and city agent representatives about whether a physical intervention in public space (Kahn Kahn, N. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh Childrens Museum.; Koblin and Echelman Koblin, A., and J.TED Vancouver Installation. ) and without a fixed infrastructure is urban design.
‘Measured Attachment—Big Data Meets Urban Design’ ( in situ analysis and synthesis) The third course, titled ‘Measured Attachment—Big Data Meets Urban Design’, was held at an architectural studio in Portland, Oregon, in the winter of 2014, and offered greater opportunity for digital analysis and design synthesis in an integrated workflow where the Rhino Grasshopper software/file as a tool achieved an agency as a tool to be used in various locations over time. Previous digital parametric software such as Maya in the 1990s were closely related to theories of time and ‘event architecture’ (Tschumi Tschumi, B.
Architecture and Disjuctions: Collected Essays 1975–1990. London: MIT Press. ), acknowledging the social constructivist ideas of Jaques Derrida, Theodor Adorno, Paul Virillio and Gillues Delueze as new ways to approach site and context using digital media.Parametric inputs of existing formal site conditions of rivers, streets and topography used Maya MEL (Alias Alias 1998. Maya: Release 1.Toronto: Alias Systems Corporation. ) scripting to acknowledge place (Schumacher Schumacher, P.“ Parametricism as Style—Parametricist Manifesto.” Presented and discussed at the Dark Side Club, 11th Architectural Biennale, Venice 2008. London: Patrik Schumacher. Later ideas of agents (Allen Allen, S.
Points + Lines: Diagrams and Projects for the City. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.) and mapping of materials, ecology and time (McHarg McHarg, I. Design with Nature.
London: Wiley.; Corner Corner, J. “Not unlike Life Itself”, Harvard Design Magazine, Fall 2004/ Winter 2005, Number 21, 1– 3. Cambridge: President and Fellows of Harvard College. ) led to the more recent seamless process of analysis and synthesis of design (Latour Latour, B.
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory.Oxford: Oxford University Press.; de Landa De Landa, Manuel. Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. ) evident in this studio project.The building programme for this project called for approximately 60,000 square feet of industrial office, or ‘maker’ space, and complementary third-spaces for Portland transit agency TriMet’s forthcoming Milwaukie Alignment light-rail corridor. The 10-week studio was divided into three parts. The studio began with two parallel site analysis studies: (1) traditional site analysis done collectively as a class; and (2) students working in groups of two or three to each identify and measure two on-site indicators of urban design characteristics for a 3 x 3 study area within the project’s Brooklyn neighbourhood located between Division Avenue and Powell Boulevard in Southeast Portland.
The students then repurposed existing Rhino Grasshopper based ‘tools’ from previous Parametric Places and lcaBCN Programme coursework.In a second part of the course, students tested the application of these reworked analytical tools for design synthesis, with one student each focusing on urban space, the urban envelope and extension into the interior building space. The last third and final part of the term was devoted to design development also using parametric design. Similar to in situ work in Barcelona, but to a greater extent, the studio worked closely with local stakeholders including the property owner Stacy Witbeck and its development team of urban design consultant John Spencer and DECA Architects, Portland’s Department of Planning and Sustainability and Portland’s transit agency TriMet.
The course approach here took advantage of the case study approach of the Parametric Places course, but began from urban analysis tools developed in previous iterations of the courses described here. The development of individual tools was similar, especially by week three of this 10-week studio course. However, by week four students were already undertaking in-depth investigations of the application of these analysis tools as tools for the synthesis of design at the scale of architectural building and urban design spaces rather than the smaller urban installations such as kiosks seen in the previous Parametric Places and lcaBCN Programme. On-site and off-site course work occurred as follows: (1) Analysis, repurpose existing Parametric Places or lcaBCN Programme tools, Weeks 1–3.Problem and purpose statements. Traditional site analysis: city, district and neighbourhood plans; land use diagrams, transit diagrams, 3 x 3 test area plan and 3D model; review of existing professional and academic analysis; site material mapping; district scale physical site model.
Parametric analysis tool using existing tools but reformulated with new urban design characteristic indicators. (2) Application to Design Synthesis, Weeks 4–6. Application of analysis tool for design synthesis at three scales of open space, urban envelope & urban architecture.(3) Design Development, Weeks 7–10. Parametric design tool at three scales: public space, urban envelope and building design (interior street).Scaled drawings and 3D modelling (see Figure 6). Previous courses described here were done either off-site or on-site but lacked a significant depth of design engagement. This architectural studio allowed in situ data collection, critical design understanding from analysis to design synthesis and design development.
Projects were ultimately self-formulated. Rhino Grasshopper software was used to both analyze and synthesize creative solutions that followed the on-site understanding gained by students in the immediate 3 x 3 test. The design development allowed a simultaneous use of parametric design from input to design output to recreate not immediate formal relationships in traditional design methods but ways to support a qualitative experience from existing urbanism understood by each student on-site. However, the short 10-week term timescale proved to be a challenge to develop a small-scale architectural scaled resolution, but this was compensated by working in groups of three students, encouraging design within a maximum building envelope, weekly evening media tutorials outside of class and the participation of outside stakeholders.Data were codified with image bitmaps used to analyze storefront elevations in the neighbourhood test area and to rate patterns of indicators for consideration in the new design proposal. Although some directional inputs were on the new site proper, measurements of urban qualities of the immediately adjacent neighbourhood were used for critical design decisions for types of urban experiences, including various qualities of spatial expansion in the new site, seating and material use. The exploration of ‘third spaces’, (Oldenburg Oldenburg, R. Celebrating the Third Place.New York: Marlow and Company.
) defined as places for people to meet in public space, demonstrated a difference in the United States conception of public meeting space versus ideas for meeting space in Europe via the original repurposed tool’s use in Barcelona (Figures and ). Systematic abstraction of information The traditional use of existing ESRI ArcGIS planning data off-site in urban design often removes students from their individual approach to abstract the phenomena they have experienced. While the codification of qualitative experience into quantitative measurements and types is a careful one to limit subjectivity, it also generates an important individualistic understanding of design formulation in urban design by each student. Examples of GI tools that assisted in the objective codification of urban information include the theory of Space Syntax (Hillier and Hanson Hillier, B., and J.The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO237 ) and software Axman (Dalton Dalton N. An Advanced Tutorial in Axman Software Manual Produced by the Space Syntax Laboratory.London: University College London.
), and the subsequent criticism by Carlo Ratti ( Ratti, C. “ Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies.” Environment and Planning B - Planning and Design 31 (4): 501– 511., ) suggests the value of a broad system of comparative data and the danger to flatten individual understandings by codifying very complex conditions of urban design.
One of the key challenges described in this paper is the systematic consistency of data collection and translation, especially between students. Collaboration is important in the complex direct and indirect processes of urban design (Heath, Oc and Tiesdell Heath, S., T. Public Places-Urban Spaces, the Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.Collaboration occurs professionally between disciplines of design team members and between students when Grasshopper scripts are passed between students from year to year and more widely using online Grasshopper forums. Collaboration was essential in the Portland studio between the three-person student team, with lead responsibility split between exterior space, envelope and building design.
It was also essential between all the course members who shared the first in situ data, as individuals would use other students’ recorded data as their design intentions clarified. Grasshopper scripts were exchanged between years of students in the Parametric Places class in Eugene.In Barcelona, the collaboration of data occurred both within the program and with other programs.
In all three courses the repetition of data gathering and codification methods was essential. Clear protocol and communication in the form of data dictionaries describing the transformation of experience was helpful. The problem to access different types of data, including data made from scratch, is well documented by MIT’s SENSEable City Lab (Nabian et al. Nabian, N., D.
Offenhuber, A.Vanky, and C. “ Data Dimension: Accessing Urban Data and Making It Accessible.” Proceedings of the ICE-Urban Design and Planning 166 (1): 60– 75. 10.1680/udap.12.00011 ). Courses taught off-site, for example, the Parametric Places course, were the most geometric for students, assigning attributes to building curves in Rhino using Rhino Grasshopper plugins HUMAN.
This method is more visual for students connecting geospatial information with codified qualitative information.Off-site or virtual site visits with Google Street View created errors in translation, and cultural differences occurred such as the children’s daycare and kindergarten uses described in the Parametric Places project Intergenerational Integration. Students today are so comfortable with off-site information that the risk exists of making presumptions about being in one’s own cultural location.
This is less likely when on-site in a different environment. On the contrary, the students with off-site projects were able to devote more effort to carefully codify and develop complex Grasshopper parametric tools than students on-site in Barcelona who spent more time in situ away from their computers.
Those students were more deeply engaged with observing or ‘seeing’ (Larson 2006) than analyzing it.The Portland studio students who had both the Grasshopper software support and indoor computing space as well as local proximity to the site to visit frequently and live in the place, had the most successful ‘see-move-see’ (Lawson Lawson, B. How Designers Think, London: Routledge. ) design projects.
Projects conducted on-site used Rhino Grasshopper but with the more abstract CSV workflow with latitude- and longitude-based qualities to sense sound, smell, feeling and taste to complement existing GI data such as tax information, lot size, last sale, address of current owner, zoning use, etc. Attributes of qualities where not assigned visually to a building curve in Rhino 3D but relied on the spreadsheet workflow—not directly visual nor in the same design environment of Rhino 3D but relied on linked CSV and OSM files. The on-site project ‘Interactive Sound’, for example, related CSV decibel levels, noise source, sound type and user persona with existing residential zoning use and ground floor use assigned in Rhino 3D first observed in person and confined with Google Street View.Urban design projects are complex. In the profession they utilize analysis and design members across disciplines and locations. The differences working on-site and off-site using both native Rhino 3D attribute information versus CSV and OSM table based spreadsheet information suggests a need to have a clear protocol between team members. While the parametric urban design methods are complex relating various types of information across software, and thus the need for systematic abstraction of information, it mirrors the real-world professional challenges of urban design.This book is not a dictionary, though it tells you all you need know about everything from Authenticity to Zips. It's not an autobiography, though it does offer a revealing and highly personal inside view of contemporary culture.
It's an essential tool kit for understanding the world around us.Deyan Sudjic studied architecture in Edinburgh, edited Domus in Milan, was the This book is not a dictionary, though it tells you all you need know about everything from Authenticity to Zips. It's not an autobiography, though it does offer a revealing and highly personal inside view of contemporary culture. It's an essential tool kit for understanding the world around us.Deyan Sudjic studied architecture in Edinburgh, edited Domus in Milan, was the director of the Venice architecture biennale, and a curator in Glasgow, Istanbul and Copenhagen. The author of The Language of Things and The Edifice Complex, Deyan Sudjic is now Director of the Design Museum, London.
In one of the thirty-odd short pieces in this book, Deyan Sudjic discusses the crates of hoarded ephemera left after his death by Warhol.They were treated as a deliberate collection, but with no curatorial rhyme or reason, maybe they were just bric-a-brac? B is For Bauhaus evokes very similar feelings. In his career as a design maven, curator and critic, Sudjic has met a lot of people and seen a lot of wonderful objects, but seems unable here to construct an essay with a throughline and a coher In one of the thirty-odd short pieces in this book, Deyan Sudjic discusses the crates of hoarded ephemera left after his death by Warhol.They were treated as a deliberate collection, but with no curatorial rhyme or reason, maybe they were just bric-a-brac? B is For Bauhaus evokes very similar feelings. In his career as a design maven, curator and critic, Sudjic has met a lot of people and seen a lot of wonderful objects, but seems unable here to construct an essay with a throughline and a coherent argument. Each piece is a jumble of anecdotes and examples, some interesting.The essay 'C Is For Chair' makes a good example: Sudjic initially says that the history of design can be understood via a history of chairs, then spends some time on chairs he likes or admires in apparent support of this claim, before suddenly concluding that the history of design in fact cannot be understood as a history of chairs - there's more to it than that. A dozen or so of these meandering pieces were enough for me, and I gave the book up.
If you want to wander through it yourself, take a smartphone: there are no illustrations and you'll want to look up several visuals per chapter.In a book of essays like this, you expect a few standouts and a lot of crap. But this book seems to be full of interesting, thoughtful writing. There's a lot of design history in here, and certainly a passing familiarity with design history will help you to enjoy this book, but I think it could be enjoyed regardless.Some essays are examinations of various architect and designers' careers, kind of just so stories for design. Others are examinations of various themes and roles in design. But ther In a book of essays like this, you expect a few standouts and a lot of crap.
But this book seems to be full of interesting, thoughtful writing. There's a lot of design history in here, and certainly a passing familiarity with design history will help you to enjoy this book, but I think it could be enjoyed regardless. Some essays are examinations of various architect and designers' careers, kind of just so stories for design.Others are examinations of various themes and roles in design. But there's a few true stand outs, that really make you think about design differently. These kinds of essays deepen your thinking and are invaluable to a practitioner. BBC BOW: 14.04.Description: An essential tool kit for understanding the modern world, by the Director of London's Design Museum, Deyan Sudjic.Not a dictionary, though it attempts to tell you all you need know about everything from Authenticity to Zips. It's not an autobiography either, though it does offer a revealing and highly personal inside view of contemporary culture.It's about what makes a Warhol a genuine fake, the creation of national identities, the mania to collect.
It's also about th BBC BOW: 14.04.Description: An essential tool kit for understanding the modern world, by the Director of London's Design Museum, Deyan Sudjic.Not a dictionary, though it attempts to tell you all you need know about everything from Authenticity to Zips. It's not an autobiography either, though it does offer a revealing and highly personal inside view of contemporary culture.It's about what makes a Warhol a genuine fake, the creation of national identities, the mania to collect.It's also about the world seen from the rear view mirror of Grand Theft Auto V, and digital ornament and why we value imperfection. It's about drinking a bruisingly dry martini in Adolf Loo's American bar in Vienna, and about Hitchcock's film sets. It's about fashion and technology, about politics and art.Born in London, Deyan Sudjic studied architecture in Edinburgh, edited Domus in Milan, was the director of the Venice architecture biennale, and a curator in Glasgow, Istanbul and Copenhagen. He's the author of The Language of Things and The Edifice Complex.Read by Deyan SudjicAbridged by Polly ColesProduced by Clive BrillA Pacificus Production for BBC Radio 4.1. A is for Authentic but how do we decide exactly what that means?C is for Car which perhaps more than any other consumer object, has shaped the texture and shape of modern life.
Deyan Sudjic considers both.What makes an object authentic? Are artists good at designing cars?2. C is for Chair. Few objects have attracted the attention of designers as much as the chair. Perhaps only the corkscrew and the bicycle have had as many reinventions.F is for film and its depiction of architects and architecture. Deyan Sudjic considers both.C is for how chairs are constantly redesigned and F is for films and architecture.Deyan Sudjic considers both.F is for Fashion.
F is for Film.Alfred Hitchcock.3. G is for Grand Theft Auto and how its creator might be the modern Charles Dickens. H is for Habitat: how Conran changed British homes and IKEA made everyone's house look the same.Deyan Sudjic considers both.G is for Grand Theft Auto, a new artform, and how Conran and Ikea have transformed domesticity. Deyan Sudjic considers both.4.K is for Kitchens and how they were once at the frontline of class warfare. N is for National Identity and the way it is somehow provisional and yet also utterly compelling.
Deyan Sudjic considers both.K is for kitchens and class warfare and N is for national identity and its complexities. Deyan Sudjic considers both.5. W is for War and whether design collections are really the place for weapons? Y asks is Youtube really so democratic? Z is for Zip and how in the thirties it was the height of modernity.Deyan Sudjic considers them all.W is for War: are museums the place for weapons? Y is for Youtube and Z is for Zip.
I am not saying that is a horrible book, but it hurts so much and it is so irritating that it could be many times better.Chapter after chapter i was wondering why someone, who is a design critic and apparently knows how should things work, could let publish book about art with not a single picture in it. I know that today it is easier to get a wi-fi connection to your mobile than buy a bread, but it is inconvenient to saearch in your smartphone page by page how each thing looks like. I find t I am not saying that is a horrible book, but it hurts so much and it is so irritating that it could be many times better.
Chapter after chapter i was wondering why someone, who is a design critic and apparently knows how should things work, could let publish book about art with not a single picture in it. I know that today it is easier to get a wi-fi connection to your mobile than buy a bread, but it is inconvenient to saearch in your smartphone page by page how each thing looks like.This is a book crammed full of ideas. Consisting of short essays on the history, philosophy, vocabulary and personality of design, arranged in an A to Z format, it has a fascinating range, from architecture to the automobile, from the Mumbai slums to Grand Theft Auto. It tells us (and I’m just picking some stuff at random that I liked) that ‘the trouble with design is that it was kidnapped by lifestyle’ Ron Arad; that ‘with Levi jeans you wear the logo - this is the graphic designer’s versionThis is a book crammed full of ideas.Consisting of short essays on the history, philosophy, vocabulary and personality of design, arranged in an A to Z format, it has a fascinating range, from architecture to the automobile, from the Mumbai slums to Grand Theft Auto.
I forgot design ≠ graphic design and so was a bit disappointed this book is mostly about buildings and things. As such it was kind of diverting, though without illustrations or knowing what travertine is I'm not entirely confident I was imagining the buildings and things properly.Frustratingly for a book where someone has gone to the trouble to make 30+ quite neat different section header pages and page furniture styles, it's appallingly proof-read – a few times, they clearly just missed out a I forgot design ≠ graphic design and so was a bit disappointed this book is mostly about buildings and things. As such it was kind of diverting, though without illustrations or knowing what travertine is I'm not entirely confident I was imagining the buildings and things properly.Frustratingly for a book where someone has gone to the trouble to make 30+ quite neat different section header pages and page furniture styles, it's appallingly proof-read – a few times, they clearly just missed out a bunch of words, and one paragraph ends on a comma.
AND I BOTHERED TO FIND THE EN-DASH FOR THIS REVIEW.Deyan Sudjic is the director he Design Museum London and a prolific author. The book reads as a map or landscape of objects and their creators Sudjic has had experience with.Because of personal perspective and a great deal of experiences, the prose is confident and crisp and is a pleasure to read.From Adolf Loos to Grand Theft Auto via Vienna and the importance of chairs, the author gives us a dictionary where each letter features a short essay on a topic filled with historical and theoretical Deyan Sudjic is the director he Design Museum London and a prolific author. The book reads as a map or landscape of objects and their creators Sudjic has had experience with. Because of personal perspective and a great deal of experiences, the prose is confident and crisp and is a pleasure to read.From Adolf Loos to Grand Theft Auto via Vienna and the importance of chairs, the author gives us a dictionary where each letter features a short essay on a topic filled with historical and theoretical insights.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |